At the end of last season (2011), the Houston Astros were bought by Jim Crane. And, as so often occurs when new management takes over an already popular organization, changes happen. Some are accepted by the general population. Others are met with disapproval. And many more just leave us scratching our heads. But, like them or not, these changes are goung to happen. The old motto - 'sink or swim' - comes to mind. If yoou are to survive in a market, you have to adapt. Adaptation to your new surroundings which not only affect you, but the rest of the competition. The changes the Astros are involved will, like a stone thrown into a pond, stir up ripples that will affect other teams.
You see, many fans around baseball - especially Astros' fans, I pressume - were afraid of one of the clauses of selling the team: relocation. Bye bye, Houston. Thanks for the memories. Time to move to greener pastures. Once again, a celebrated franchise moves on to a new city (remember the Titans, I mean Oilers?). The loss of a team can be devastating for the market of one city and a boom for another's.
But hold your horses. In this case, the relocation of the Astros doesn't involve moving to a new city. Just like the Brewers in 1998, Houston is taking a similar step, they are realigning. A move to the American League (AL) West might be enough to restructure the franchise. The Angels, Mariners, Athletics and Rangers are now the new rivals. Pitchers in the batter's box are a distant memory. Instead of fighting five teams for a playoff spot, it's now four. These are some of the changes that are goung to ttake place. The only question remaining is: what happens to the rest of the league?
Three things are going to be questioned because of this move. 1. What is the new value of Interleague play? 2. Do we remove the Designated Hitter (DH) for the AL or does the National League (NL) implement it? 3. Will the League expand? And these may very well be the questions at the tip of the iceberg. Because of this realignment, baseball is going to change.
Interleague play is now a day-to-day issue. Unless a week long bye similar to the National Football League (NFL) is used and more off days are introduced, the there is no way to avoid it. And even if this were implemented, there would still be some problems. But this is not what I want to focus on. This season (2012) will be the last season where Interleague games will take place for a couple of weeks in May and June. The last season where rare meetings occurred. They are now a thing of everyday. So what changes? The value of these games.
In an 162 game season, every team must try to get as much wins as possible; especially against division teams. But with everyday Interleague games, these take more importance. Who plays who can change the whole playoff scenario. Imagine a clash between the St. Louis Cardinals and the Detroit Tigers. If St. Louis wins, then the rest of the AL Central can move up, supposing that the other teams in the AL Central are playing themselves or other AL teams. At the same time, NL Central teams play teams from their league and fail to move up. St. Louis and the rest of the AL Central can move up, whilst the others can't. Who you play matters much more. Supposing you're the underdog of your league and you're playing the World Series pick from the other league, then you're screwed. Interleague is much more important now, aswell as when these games take place.
This brings me to my second point: the DH. Major League Baseball (MLB) Rule 6.10 states that a position player that does not take the field can bat in place of the pitcher. Also, during Interleague play, the rules from the league of the host team take effect. So, when the Yankees visit the Mets, C.C. Sabathia must graba a bat and Raul Ibanez must warm the bench. If the opposite happens, then it's Johan Santana sitting in between innings and somebody else will move to the plate. This rare event is sometimes a well deserved break for pitchers and allows other players to take the field or bat.
But everyday Interleague will change that too. The sight of a DH in the NL will be much more common. Watching AL pitchers hack away will also increase. A compromise will then have to be reached. Do we use the DH throughout the MLB or do pitchers start heading for the batting cages? Throughout the minor leagues, the All-Star game and International competitions such as the World Baseball Classic, the DH is used regardless of team affiliation, stadium, or other factors. Personally, I am not a fan of the DH rule. It does provide an element of interest for the playoffs but it's not something I would miss if gone. What I do believe will happen, sadly, is that the DH will be forced upon the NL. If everybody else uses it, then all will be made to use it.
The other, more appealing option for the average fan will be eliminating the DH. AL teams will argue against this because of health concerns to pitchers (like Chien Ming Wang's injury while running the bases during Interleague play, ending his career with the Yankees). Because of the DH being used everywhere else sans the NL, then I don't think AL pitchers will be batting any time soon.
Finally, expansion teams. Where do we go now? Already baseball writers are reporting on rumours of an expansion team in Mexico. Aside from whether you agree or not, expansion is a likely step for MLB if: regular Interleague fails and no agreement can be reached on the DH rule. Other factors which will affect this are the Astros move and the addition of a new wild card spot in the playoffs. What the sport is trying to do is create (or motivate) competition for the teams. Interleague game value will rise. Having a five team AL West increases the chances for a playoff spot. A six team NL Central, was more competitive, but less charming than a four team AL West.
If regular Interleague games don't work for any reason, then expansion IS going to happen. Adding two teams per league is a likely event. The downside is that we're back to square one. Instead of having one six-team conference, we now have two. This would reverse what Commisioner Selig has done and further regress his attempts to have a more competitive League. Then what? Do we add four teams instead? How about six teams to have six six-team divisions? Sounds very stressful. But in the long run, it might happen. But then the playoffs would have to be expanded once again. Money and time are then a factor.
I believe that within the next couple of years we will hear more stories on expansion. There will be new teams in the league. When they arrive is another matter.
Moving the Astros is not only going to change the landscape of how competitive the game is. It shows that there are plans to redesign the American baseball world. The three things I've explained are what I think to be the first of a long list of changes planned for the future. But Interleague value, the use of the DH and expansion teams are topics that will be heard of more often by the end of this season.